WebSignificance of biotype in implant selection suggests that – immediate implant – thick biotype is more preferable as thin biotype is mostly associated with more of the recession with increased risk of unfavorable outcomes.[8] Table 3 describe various studies related to the biotype with peri-implant mucosa. [14] WebTherefore, although tissue biotype is an inherent trait that varies from patient to patient, it can be transformed through precise management of the implant position, implant design, and prosthetic design triad such that a desired esthetic outcome is achieved.
Optimizing Gingival Biotype Using Subepithelial Connective …
WebJul 14, 2024 · Thin soft tissue biotype. Implant malposition. These tissue abnormalities can be treated with flapless surgery, autologous connective tissue graft and xenograft. fillers in peri-implant gap. Also, is important to adjust the occlusal scheme to avoid interferences during excursive movements during the masticatory function. Complete edentulous jaws WebTraductions en contexte de "résultats prothétiques" en français-anglais avec Reverso Context : Des restaurations durables pour des résultats prothétiques prévisibles grâce à un environnement de conception et d'usinage contrôlé fly 7 airlines
Traduction de "prosthetic results" en français - Reverso Context
WebDec 10, 2015 · The peri-implant biotype is categorized as thin, if the outline of an underlying periodontal probe can be seen though the gingiva; and thick, if the probe cannot be seen.30 Recent studies have shown … WebNov 21, 2024 · In some studies thin biotype is defined as “probe seen through the labial tissue,” while in others 1mm or less soft tissue thickness is used as a criterion. There are, however, some studies that have shown an increased risk of mucosal recession around dental implants, in patients with thin soft tissue biotype [ 22 – 24 ]. WebFeb 10, 2024 · Thick biotype teeth were 2 times more resistant to recession than thin biotype teeth (RR: 2.03; P = .03; 95%CI: 1.2-3.5). Implant success rates were 100%. Lack of transparency and MR at facial implant sites lasted an average of 52 months and up to 144 without signs of inflammation or pocket formation regardless of the individual's biotype. fly 787